Web11. apr 2024 · This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. WebAbstract. As both indigenous and foreign universities increasingly move to satisfy China’s steeply growing demand for management education, an understanding of what Chinese students regard as being the most important aspects of an effective MBA teacher will be crucial. This is especially the case in view of traditional Confucianist informed ...
7 features of a good response to reviewers Tress Academic
WebResponse to Reviewer 1 (gmd-2024-222) The manuscript provides a new global model for water quality assessment (DynQual). ... One of the model's strengths (compared to other existing large-scale water quality models) is the sector contributions (e.g., livestock, irrigation, manufacturing) to surface water pollution per grid and day while ... Web23. okt 2024 · One of the most common reasons for requesting reviewer suggestions is a lack of available reviewers for journals. Finding a suitable reviewer for a manuscript is a … sarah griffiths dentist builth wells
How to Write a Peer Review - PLOS
Web1. apr 2011 · If you decide to resubmit, it is possible that (1) the reviewers already have a poisoned view of the work and (2) you will receive additional criticisms of your work when the reviewers look at other parts of the paper they did not read carefully during the first round of reviews. WebSome examples from the web: As per your suggestion, we're hanging out.; Information that I wouldn't get from a dead guy per your suggestion!; Per your suggestion, I am having a silly good time.; Per your suggestion, I went with a Titanic vibe.; Per usual, your suggestions have made the impossibleness of this endeavor seem possible.; As per our suggestions, it is … WebThe reviewer should analyze the manuscript for the merits and demerits, give an honest and exact comment and provide necessary suggestions to increase the quality of the work. The reviewer should not review the manuscript that is co-authored by him/her and anyone related to their institution. After accepting the review, the reviewer should ... sarah grossman baystate business brokers